Wednesday, March 31, 2004

I'm Not Paranoid...

... yet. Sure, keeping tabs on juvenile offenders using GPS seems reasonable and good for the kid and society in general. As one probation officers says, "If I have a kid with a history of marijuana usage, I may want to take a look at where this kid goes. If he's in a drug area, I may want to jump in a car and go out there, counsel him and bring him back to the office."

But in dumbed-down America where no child is left behind, no a propos literary allusion is left to the imagination either, considering the company who makes the system took all the fun out of trying ot make 1984 references by calling their product Big Brother Monitoring.

And just in case you think this isn't dangerous and won't go any further, I leave you with a quote straight from the horse's mouth:

"There are just populations in every state that GPS is not good for," [Beth] Welch [Big Brother's spokesperson] said. "An offender who failed to pay child support is not a good fit, but a convicted sex offender is."
So not only do they have to register when they move to a new town, they might get electronically tracked? Debt to society, my ass. Let's ask George Amirault how he feels about this...

No comments: